a scaleble solution
Hi,
“Let go of your pickle”.
Just considering the snare release as a toggle for the moment I assume your 'scalable' comment is referring to the fact that the global patch change would a kludge for this feature as two snares with this option would require four patches to be set up ie XX, OX, XO, OO.
What
If this is the supposition then I agree that's what a patch is for; but I'm suggesting that a drum brain should have this feature for the snare built in - that's why I got the shock, the hi-hat has special hardware to enable it's functionality but it appears that nobody has ever taken into account the dual nature of a snare drum at the design stage.
“Let go of your pickle”.
A real snare has a mechanism to control the snare tension and also a lever to enable or disable the action. Given that the current trend is for sample based triggering rather than synthesis, the e-drum analogy for the snare mechanism using the existing hardware means using two sample sets; one with snare on - note A, one with snare off - note B.
Being a complete sociopath I've nursed the idea a while and it seems to me I could have asked: is it possible to have the entire snare mechanism as a controller. Imagine then a snare tensioner as a control message managing the velocity levels between note A and note B – but then this looks like a problem for the software sampler; even if the brain were to produce such data.
Forget it: about as likely as Mitch Mitchell or Keith Moon using a 12” snare.
Anyway. Do the two existing sensors have an unused state that can unambiguously be considered as the note toggle?
PS. I'm not holding my pickle.