i'm at work right now but i was able to get a scope so I'll try that out and the loose piezo idea when I get home. I will recheck all joints and wires but I checked continuity as I built as it should be okay but you never know. I would be surprised that every pad built is bad because of joints; I don't mean to sound cocky but I'm pretty good at soldering.
as for the construction of the pad they are acoustic drums with a 6 spoke MDF crossbar with a neoprene coated metal riser for the head piezo, rim piezo is mounted on reverse of crossbar. Here is an image of an open drum before piezo installation: http://i.imgur.com/0Unfd4X.jpg?2 . cone is poron soft layered (4 layers of 1/4" and one layer of 3/8") cut into a cone ~35mm tall with a width of 38mm at the base and 7mm at the top (roland style cone).
edit: tested continuity again, fully open on all. the scope showed a signal though, slightly cooler than the roland pads (0.2v versus 0.5v resolution). Waves were comparable although the rolands were more complex (or possibly noisy). Taken through the cable and at the solder points on the jacks in the drums. Noted that wiring is rim to tip and head to sleeve; in addition i noted the ceramic side is up. would the brass side being down/mounted (with double sided tape) pose an issue? i doubt it but figured i'd ask. the only difference noted with a bare piezo was a slightly hotter signal but I expected that. Still have to try making a piezo only trigger to connect directly to MD. Connected 9vdc to piezo and noted that it emits a click which is expected for the diaphragm to my knowledge. Gonna eat dinner now but can post waveforms later if that would help anyone dx?