This IC has native 20Mhz support. It has some things better than the atmega32 and it is cheaper (atmega32 costs 9€ in farnell, and atmega324 costs 5€ in farnell)
Why don't we start using it?
Why not using atmega324
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Why not using atmega324
by elrules » Tue Dec 11, 2007 4:26 pm
- elrules
- Posts: 629
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:51 pm
- Location: Murcia, Spain, Europe, The World
Re: Why not using atmega324
by dmitri » Tue Dec 11, 2007 5:15 pm
Don't know to be honest:) I thought Atmega324/644 were not as widely available as Atmega32. There is nothing preventing from using Atmega324/644 instead. In fact I tested it with Atmega644 ( and it worked fine at 24MHz) and I always compile firmwares for Atmega324/644 along with all others.
- dmitri
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8706
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 8:05 pm
Re: Why not using atmega324
by dmitri » Tue Dec 11, 2007 5:21 pm
On uk.farnell Atmega324P is "Awaiting delivery"...
- dmitri
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8706
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 8:05 pm
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 136 guests